photo by morgan tepsic
As a teenager, I felt natural hooking up with guys–a seatbelt in my back, a heel popping out the car cigarette lighter….but I also felt confused. I was unsure how to treat the male body, what to do with it, exactly. When I lost my virginity, my partner proudly showed me the six pack abs he’d been working on, I think I was supposed to swoon or feel something, instead I stared– neutral.
“Wangs are ugly. It’s like God went to tie a bow, and just kinda forgot what he was doing in the middle.” This is one of my best friends, joking, over coffee. I had asked her about this cultural idea: the female body as a work of art (who doesn’t like naked women!) and the male body as, well, gross. And it’s not just penis that gets “ew”–it’s the whole of male bodies: hairy, sweaty, narrow or bulky (and of course not all male bodies have penises or extra hair.) While my gay friends were hooking up with dudes saying things like “you are so hot, you make me wanna cum” my female friends had been raised to think: the dick is just lucky to be here.
How much do girls spouting this sound like homophobic straight guys? You know, guys who rant, wide-eyed, about how they could never. EVER. get with a guy. Are women unconsciously aligning their beliefs with those of the great white bro-dudes? Not to sound like your-mom’s-feminism, but oh, hai patriarchy.
I’m not sure there was any lust when my first partner lifted his shirt ala The Situation, but I do know I continued to feel confused about expressing my lust as a teenager. Women are culturally taught to repress desire–this is what Lady Porn Day was about–it’s become okay, post Sex and The City, for women to use vibrators–but jacking it to hot dude porn? “Ew” that gives masturbation a desire.
I’m still learning what owning my desire looks like and porn is a good example of where I still feel uncomfortable with male bods. I feel intimidated ogling men in porn. There seems to be a silent idea embedded here: men are creepy. I see this in sex writing–many of my fellow sex-positive writers are also women, and the idea is: if a guy is vocal about sex, it’s icky. Predator-like. If this is what we (unconsciously) think, how can we celebrate and enjoy these bodies that carry a connotation of danger?
The thing is, male bodies are more visible then ever: perfume ads with unrealistic abs and shoulders, men’s mags pushing the T shape, and according to a study by psychologist Deborah Schooler this is harmful. Schooler found that men who consume television, music videos and magazines felt worse about their bodies. Interestingly, these guys had unhealthier sex lives too. Schooler explains: “If you’re in an intimate situation and these aspects of your body are exposed, you have to deal with the fact that your body doesn’t meet the ideal. You’re concerned with how your partner is evaluating you, how you look and smell.”
A bear-like ex–chubby and furry– once said: “Why don’t you ever kiss my stomach, or touch me this way. You make me feel so unattractive”. In some ways I still feel uncomfortable with male bodies. Even with my husband, I don’t quite know how to express lust. But when I tell my him that I love his body and want to drink it up, I mean it.
The male body = gross is an idea that hurts men. It’s something I heard more when I was younger, but there are curious ways it’s seeped into my adulthood. I think from now on, when I hear men=gross, I’ll challenge myself to own my lust and remark: The male body isn’t gross. It’s sexy.

59 Comments
There is something very telling about the male body. . . the penis. You can take a picture of a female nude, aroused or not, and to the untrained eye there is little difference. An erection is undeniable.
Blake, interesting thing to point out. And yet when we read Playgirl and such the penises are NEVER ERECT!!!! I have to ask why?? Seriously? This was another conundrum of Lady Porn Day, so many girls were owning their desires and wanting to see hot guy bods and peens, but they were always softies.
I like both softies and rock-hard(ies) but I kinda think the penis=ew response has more to do with limp? In my mind anyway.
Having a sexually traumatic past has made seeing men naked very uncomfortable for me. In the past male nudity has meant danger, and humiliation (for me.)
For me there has to be an emotional connection, and safety, in order to see the beauty. Otherwise I am uncomfortable and feel weird.
I think my husband’s body is beautiful, all of it. He is one of a kind. He is tall, lanky, muscular, redhead. I think he is gorgeous!
Thanks so much for writing about this. I think that this truly opens up the conversation of sexuality that is important. From a guy’s perspective, I do feel that for a long time it was hard to see the sensual, erotic, or attractive quality of the male figure; that partially has to do with my religious upbringing and how they tried to breed me to be a homophobe and in the long run that didn’t, but another story for another time. But I think even for more moderate to progressive guys who are supportive of LGBT people and rights are still uncomfortable with the male body, it’s erotic quality and the personal desires they try not to think about.
This seems to be the last vestige of men fully embracing all things in relation to sexuality and all of its nuances. Also the thing that strikes me is this is opposite side of the same coin of sexism that women deal with in mainstream culture, only for men and specific to them. By no means is it equal or that I am conflating how culturally modern society tends to undercut and turn women into second class citizens, but I think even if it is less severe it is just as damaging.
As I have found with age and experience I am predominantly straight, but have an attraction, whether true bi-sexuality I am unsure, or at least an erotic imagination for all sorts of sexuality, gay, straight, bi, and everything else in between. Maybe with more age and experience it will become more defined, but I think it is an exciting place to explore who you really are sexually and I hope men get past this and can do the same. Sorry for the huge sermon, love this post and what you do.
Jen,
Thank you for bringing this up! Unfortunately, far too many people have experiences like this and my heart just wrenches for you. While childhood sexual trauma makes this phenomenon more intense, I think this happens for people with many different kinds of sad/traumatic childhood experiences. When i interviewed David Steinberg, he said something that always stuck with me. That sex can open up a huge door inside yourself, without your expecting it. Suddenly you are grappling with the time you were embarrassed as a kid, or embarrassed someone else. Sex makes you vulnerable and brings up these hidden truths and emotions. When this comes up for me during sex I feel *especially* uncomfortable with the male body. This can be so hard to articulate in the heat of the moment. But I’ve learned to tell my parter: we need to change what we are doing, this feels to intense, too much, somehow triggering.
Redhead,
Here is how the current homophobia works: because we all know it’s not okay to call people “fag” or deride people for their sexual orientation it becomes an internalized homophobia. So instead of “you are so gay” it’s “well that’s okay for you but EW I could not possibly be gay, male bodies, gross”. I really think this stems from homophobia–it’s not logical, human bodies are beautiful, overall!
Also I agree with you, sexism hurts men too!!! And on the religious note, anyone find it strange that religion seemed to steep this cultural idea about male bodies AND YET Jesus on the cross had the bod of a total babe? Am I going to far with that one? Oops.
HAHAHAHA. As someone who is still religious person, in that we’re the socialisty kind of religious (my priest is female, and we are pro-choice, LGBT supportive, pro-peace and open to other religions) and has a sense of humor; that is hilarious/true. There is homoeroticism all over the Bible and they do make Jesus very erotic on that cross, no question.
Right?!! Honestly, Jesus was kinda made out to be a hottie, all around. Weird-wang or not.
And on a more serious note, Jen, here is the direct quote of what I was trying to get at: “Because sex is as powerful as it is, sometimes a big door opens up inside you. Suddenly, your emotional guts are all over the table. I think sex, touch, it is powerful in that way. Suddenly, you are dealing with the fact that you never got touched as a child, suddenly you are dealing with the time something happened and you were embarrassed. Suddenly, all sorts of larger issues, even existential ones leap up, and there you are in the middle of them.”
<3
Honestly? Guys are hot.
Or, to be more precise, the idea of the male body is hot. In the real world, there are some hot guys, some that leave me indifferent and some I find downright ugly (although it’s probably not politically correct to say so). It’s the same with women’s bodies… for some I’d willingly change teams. Anytime. (If only I knew what to do with them?!! *lol*)
Really, men are great. Skin and fur and sweat and smell… *yum*.
I don’t think I’ve ever thought “gross” about a guy’s body except when it comes to crotch-smell and that level of muscle where your veins all stand out. I do, however, look at a lot of guys and think, “Meh.” I think this has much more to do with what I am and am not attracted to and less to do with any notion that the male body is “yuckier” than the female body. After all, no one’s crotch smells good when they’ve been walking around all day and stand-out veins aren’t a good look for anybody.
Oh! And wangs are weird-looking, but I think vulvas are, too. To me, they both kind of resemble what’s left over after a shark attack. But that doesn’t mean they’re not great or worthy of sexiness!
Diandra, mmm skin and fur and sweat. Yummy.
Ellie, it does seem like women are more choosy then men. I think is again because we aren’t encouraged to own our desires –though some may say it’s a hormonal thing, I am not sure. The truth is that me and a guy who looks better than me could stand at a bar all night, and I have a better chance of getting laid. Probably. When I look around nightclubs and what not, it seems this is just the way it works. Women seem to be more choosy, but we can’t remove that phenomenon from the truth that women are taught to disown their desire.
Further ladies, I am wondering what you guys think about the whole metrosexualization thing that happened with men. IS THAT women beginning to own their desires? I have some ideas, but curious if anyone else does too…
You bring up some really interesting points that I didn’t think of when you first posed the question. I am especially struck by “Are women unconsciously aligning their beliefs with those of the great white bro-dudes?” – that internalized male homophobia would be so rampant that women are afraid to be attracted to men, too! Remarkable! I’m also really interested in the first comment, that men’s arousal is rarely secret/questionable.
When I began my relationship with my husband, I had previously had relationships with girls. I wanted so much to call him “beautiful”, but I didn’t know if that was acceptable to say to a man. Finally once I asked him if I could say it; he liked it.
This is a slightly different situation, but for a few months we were living with my BFF and her wife, a lesbian couple, and they ALWAYS went out of their way to squeal about how “gross” any guys portrayed sexually on TV were. After awhile, it started to offend my husband – would it be acceptable, in a household with 3 men and one woman, if the men called every woman on TV a dog? (well, I’m sure it happens…)
There is also the issue of bodybuilding. I can’t remember the name of this documentary I saw, but the subject of the documentary, a man, said “Do you think women are attracted to this body? They don’t think it’s sexy, they think it’s disgusting.” That’s what I was reminded of when you mentioned that you felt neutral towards dude’s six-pack-abs. Bodybuilding seems to be something men do to feel good about themselves, not to specifically attract women, similarly to beauty rituals women may participate in that men don’t even notice. Like the guy showing off his abs is like when I tell my husband, “Feel how soft my legs are, I shaved!” Last time we had sex I mentioned later that I “didn’t even shave.” He said he didn’t notice!! I was like, well then, fuck that, I’m not going to try so hard to shave on the days I feel like I might get laid…
Love this topic, it’s so fascinating. Closing note: Tom of Finland = HOTT.
Oh, I’m also interested in your question about “meterosexualization”. I see that in a lot of different ways. Maybe that’s the kind of man some women are truly attracted to, but I feel like it might be even further away from owning desire, because it is sanitizing men, making them “safe”, in a way that doesn’t appeal to me personally. Alternately, women have been encouraged to sanitize that way (I’m thinking of hair removal, mostly) for a long time, so it’s kind of like “payback.” I am tempted to simplify to a nasty generalization that girls attracted to that look on men “don’t want a REAL MAN”, though obviously it’s not that simple, and most people wouldn’t say (though some would!) that men who want sanitized, hairless women also “don’t want a REAL WOMAN.” (fully recognizing REAL as a judgment not an actual state of being). Is “meterosexualization” the opposite of bodybuilding? Something men do specifically TO ATTRACT women, not to feel good about themselves? A combination of both?
Drop Out Boogie, I relate SO MUCH to the “beautiful” thing. I always call my husband beautiful because that is how I see him, his skin is smooth, his hair is thick, his eyes are sparkly…he’s gorgeous! And it does seem I am much more comfortable with a man who is pretty and maybe a little femme than full on masculine. I almost wanted to say in my last comment that sweat and fur = yum but is it weird I want to put some eyeliner on him too?
As far as the muscle building–interesting points! A friend once said to me “there is beauty women see and beauty men see”. He was referring to girl’s competitive dieting and how it made no sense to men. I think body building is quite similar.
Drop Out Boogie Oh, just caught your second comment. I think those are really interesting questions. And it’s interesting that in my previous comment, I admitted I want smooth pretty boys, or furry ones that wear eyeliner! That somehow just feels safe to me. Maybe it’s a hint of fetish, maybe it’s just my type or a phase? I am not sure.
Here is what I have been thinking about the metrosexualization. It reminds me of the “trade up” phenomenon in evolutionary psychology–dangerous ground I know! But basically, the idea with this is that while men are naturally polyamorous, women are naturally hypergamous–meaning they are with one partner at a time, but always looking for a “trade-up” the partner with the bigger nest, who brings home the bigger boar, so to speak.
In seems that metrosexualization is about status, we are trying to turn our men into “trade-ups” by giving them the newer sneakers, skinnier jeans, better haircuts. Giving them a higher social status so we get something of a “trade-up” without actually trading. It also up’s our social status.
Now, what you bring up, why the smooth, hairless, coiffed thing has become what is socially valuable and “hot”, that is interesting and something I don’t have an answer for!
Thanks so much for this post, Rachel. I am a bit short on time right now, but I’ll get back to it soon.
For the moment, a quick anecdote from my art-school years that relates to this:
As an art student, we regularly did (nude) figure drawing. And I recall a time when one of the male models got an erection during the session. He was visibly uncomfortable with the situation. After the class ended, the female students in particular were going on about how gross and creepy that was, that he got an erection while they were drawing him, though some male students agreed as well. Not entirely sure what to make of that, but it seems relevant.
I remember at the time, I did not say anything, but I felt really bad for the guy, and it was really clear to me that the women didn’t understand how involuntary erections can be. But looking back, it seems there is more to it than just that. Like, as long as a male body is not sexual, then it is somehow okay. But when you inject sexuality into, suddenly it is gross and creepy.
“Ellie, it does seem like women are more choosy then men. I think is again because we aren’t encouraged to own our desires –though some may say it’s a hormonal thing, I am not sure. The truth is that me and a guy who looks better than me could stand at a bar all night, and I have a better chance of getting laid. Probably. When I look around nightclubs and what not, it seems this is just the way it works. Women seem to be more choosy, but we can’t remove that phenomenon from the truth that women are taught to disown their desire.”
I’m a bit confused with this response to my thoughts. How is my knowing what I’m not attracted to not an owning of my desires? I feel like you’re indicating that my un-attraction to veiny men is me repressing myself.
Ellie, Oops sorry! I should have said, this isn’t about your experience but more of a segway thought, I am inspired by your confession that most men you see=meh. Not to say that your “meh” means YOU aren’t owning your desires but that I think you are right, it’s not always “ew gross” we think/hear but more of a “meh” in general. And THAT brings me back to the desire thing. For the record, grrrrl, I am with you on the whole veins poppin’ out thing. I think NAMING that you don’t like that actually IS owning your desire! But thanks so much for bringing this back to me and allowing me to clarify! Something I find super important for conversations, whether online or off. Sorry for being vague and publish-happy before. Hope this makes sense.
Xakudo,
Wow. My mind is really going with that story because I could see myself also having an “ew” reaction, especially when I was younger. So I totally get where that might be the response, and maybe it is because of the “connotation of danger” thing. But whats sad is that this is all that guy gets painted with when really–poor guy! It’s heartbreaking that there was zero empathy for him.
That *is* much clearer, thanks! I was really confused there for a bit.
You raise some interesting points about the male/female gaze we have as denizens of the 21th Century –
As a bisexual, I find all bodies either gross or hot depending on my mood, and how intellectually attracted I am to the person I am “desiring”. Pleasing men (I haven’t pleased many people mind you) was never difficult for me because I just imagined they’d like what I like – our gender differences don’t change THAT much of our biological make-up. Nerve endings are still in the same place
Yeah, sometimes the extra hair gets to me, but it’s the human body – women can be gross too. Growing up, I always thought if I ended up with a male mate, he would have a hairless chest – a desire I learned from watching porn and enjoying ads of men without their shirts on. It turns out I love my male mate so much I don’t really care about his hairy chest.
I actually find it is easier for me to be lusty with my man, and more effectively communicate my lust, if I am feeling “predatory” or “confident”, usually after a good day. I’ve never felt bad ogling men in porn… that’s what they’re there for!
Man, I’m so glad you wrote about this! I get so sick of men’s bodies being treated like a joke, and women only being sexualized. All bodies are both beautiful and disgusting, it’s all in the matter of looking.
I think part of this problem is that women are objectified much more than men. Thinking about my own past, during sexual experiences men would always compliment me on appearance: you have such a great body, or I love your breasts. I would always compliment men on their behavior: I love it when you do this, or that feels really good. I have finally come to realize that this is just another way of being objectified; I am desirable as an object, not a participant. Men love the female body, but not any of her actions. We are much more uncomfortable with objectifying men, so we say their body is gross, but their actions are sexy.
I think your comment about metrosexualization is pretty interesting. Where I think it stems from is our desire to objectify men more, but, since in our culture men hold a status that cannot be reproached, we are turning them into women. This way we can say they are sexy and beautiful and treat them as objects of our fantasies without changing the status quo.
Fruzse, lol @ “that what they are there for” quite true! I also like both a waxy clean chest as wel as a furry one. Both can be sexy.
Eliza, SO MUCH THIS COMMENT!!!!!! You are blowing my mind. So right that the language we even use is strangely gendered–about women looking a certain way and guys actually be the ones who are doing/performing even experiencing. Super interesting idea about turning men into women, certainly when I am “objectifying” my partner and trying to own my lust, I use such female language–he is pretty or beautiful. When I have to come up with other terms, I struggle! I think you’ve struck a nerve with the idea that this is about the fact that the culture makes it so man cannot be objectified. I also wonder though if this has to do with my bisexuality…though I am not sure.
When I first started making porn sites, I had mixed feelings about naked men. I enjoyed looking at them but they didn’t start the engines, as it were. As time has gone on, I’ve really come to appreciate the beauty of the male form. I love looking at penises. They’re lovely. I honestly think the “ew!’ reaction is a result of the penis being hidden from view and from society’s expectation that women won’t visually admire men.
@Eliza:
This is very interesting to me, because I agree about the objectification bit. But I actually see the lack of objectification of male partners as a problem–a negative–rather than a benefit. As a guy, I have always felt like my partners appreciated what I could do for them and how I could make them feel, but never actually appreciated me or my body.
On the other hand, I think–as you say–many women feel that their actions, and therefore themselves, are not being appreciated.
And this is interesting, then. When my body is not appreciated–only my actions–I don’t feel like I am being appreciated. And when women’s actions aren’t appreciated–only their bodies–they don’t feel like they are being appreciated.
I am strongly inclined to believe that both are true, and that neglecting appreciation of either a person’s body or their actions is failing to appreciate the whole person. Speaking with regard to sexual relationships, of course.
@Frusz E:
I have similar feelings. Though I am straight, I certainly am not fond of my own body hair (in fact, I would say that is one of my greatest bodily insecurities) and I tend to see it as unattractive on other guys. And I tend to assume my partners feel similarly as you, “I love my male mate so much I don’t really care about his hairy chest.” i.e. loved in spite of my body. Which really is not a good feeling.
@The thread in general:
I definitely get the “I’m attracted to what I’m attracted to” thing. But I think there is a danger in believing that is immutable. Perhaps I am just strange for a human being, but I am actually fairly adaptive in what I find attractive, and it can change–to a point–based on experiences with people. Things I do not initially find pleasing about a partner’s body, I will often find myself appreciating and loving later on in the relationship, and then find it attractive in others as well. And as I continue to get older (I am not that old–mid 20′s), I find my appreciation for different body types and facial structures and complexions expanding.
And I wonder if part of that flexibility and malleability on my part is due simply to being open to it. Perhaps there is a self-fulfilling prophecy in saying, “I’m attracted to what I’m attracted to, and that’s that. Can’t do anything about it.”
On the other hand, perhaps the malleability itself varies from person to person. It is like picky eaters vs super-non-picky/adventurous eaters, perhaps.
awe, Rachel, you’re a sweetheart. This has been something I have been thinking about a lot, so I had time to adequately process my idea.
I’m fascinated to see the trend in how we are starting to objectify men more and more in our media. I think we (as a society) have got the wrong end of the stick. The point in gender equality is not to just start objectifying everybody, but to start actually seeing everyone as PEOPLE.
The question I have to ask now is, can we see something as beautiful without objectifying it?
oh, and one more thing about gendered language in sex: notice the difference in terms used for oral sex, “blow job” and “giving head”. Women’s sexual action with that “icky penis” is a ‘job’, or we’re blowing, not a very pretty term, while men’s sexual action is ‘giving’, a much kinder term, presumably more fitting for women’s prettier gentials. What a disservice to both men and women.
Ms. Naughty, Thanks so much for sharing that. It honestly makes me feel a lot better about my experiences. I think so often when we look at people who are so visibly sex positive and have it figured out it can feel like it’s just us out on a limb.
Xakudo, oooh what juicy ideas on the being objectified for body as well as for ones actions. I see this want and need in myself and in my male partner too. And yes of course we want both, right? When we say “Objectifying” bodies what we mean that we are only see them as one dimensional–sexual. What’s weird is we don’t tend to get upset when we see human beings in a one dimensional manner that is something other than sexual, like being smart for example. A little consensual objectification I think can be good. But the key to this is being seen as your FULL sexual self. Because sexuality is actually not one dimensional! Our sexuality is so much more than how sexy we look.
I also agree with the “you are attracted to what you are attracted to” thread. If our experiences shape our our preferences and the things that get us hot, doesn’t that mean our likes and hot spots would be shifting as we grow and have more experiences?
Eliza, Yes! I struggled with that very idea here, the answer being: “well let’s just objectify men too!” Which is why I included the study bit about how unrealistic body standards hurt men too. I almost wanted to ask my twitter followers, when we were engaging about this topic, curious if they would SEND me photos of men/masculine characteristics they do find sexy. But then I realized that would be walking the line of objectification, or skeeze.
The thing that it comes down to, though, is what I was saying to Xakudo above. I think that a little objectification isn’t a bad thing. After-all, if I continue exploring my desires around the male body, it would be nice to have some hot guy porn to help me discover this. What ideally should be the case (and isn’t) is that my options of “hot guy porn” include a huge range of body types, ethnicities, gender type etc. It seems, if there is anything this thread shows it’s we humans like a vast range.
& Wow on the language bit. Super interesting. I *wonder* and this is a naive, shot in the dark, if any of that comes from the so called oldest profession of sex work?
I definitely think some men’s bodies are works of art. I prefer natural long lean muscles, not real bulky. I don’t like it when a guy looks like he spends hours at the gym every day–dumb jock look. I like smooth vs. hairy (although a happy trail is sexy). I have a thing for arms and hands with long slender fingers. I don’t really have a thing for six packs, but that crease that goes from the hip bone down to the pubic bone (I think it’s called the inguinal ligament) drives me crazy. I’ve never been into butts.
As for penis I don’t like them super long or super thick. A nice happy medium is fine with me with a good firm erection. Don’t get me wrong. I’m just talking about aesthetics here. I’m not turning any down if they’re attached to a nice guy.
So yeah. I definitely appreciate the male body.
This is an amazing article/thread!!
I am so sick of people telling me the female body is hands down more attractive than the male body. I would always weakly protest, and point out that a straight male is perhaps not the best person to tell a bi female which is more attractive (as a matter of fact rather than personal taste).
The male body is incredibly sexy (hair, sweat and all) but yet, I’ve never really complimented a guy on his body. It almost feels like it shouldn’t be important as long as he is doing the right things in bed.
It seems illogical that straight women would say they find other women more attractive- surely this is conditioning?
Thanks for this article, I’m going to use this as a chance to expand on those conversations in which people tell me hands down that women are more attractive.
Xakudo- you are absolutely right, I did not mean to imply that only actions should be appreciated. I agree with Rachel that sexuality is multi-dimensional, and we should respect that about our partners.
Rachel- ha, that cracks me up that you wanted people to send you pictures! Objectification is a really strange part of everyone’s sexuality. I’m not sure where it comes from, or why we all seem to need to do it, but it definitely has it’s role. What I think the best solution for all of us is to start trying to look at one another as individuals. Instead of, what do I like about all men, or what are the sexy traits of women, we should instead look at our partner and think what do I like about YOU?
I’m also amused by how often all of us in this thread talk about liking or disliking hair and sweat, as if this defines the male body. I’m a woman, and I am hairy and sweaty, too! I like men’s bodies because I like the men, and while certain traits are more macho than others, Xakudo is right in keeping an open mind to all types of bodies and features and letting our gut attraction be our guide, instead of what we think we are attracted to.
>how can we celebrate and enjoy bodies that carry a connotation of danger?<
Am I the only one (forgive me, I didn't read all the comments) who thought "connotation of danger = YUM"? ;o) I like the tension of knowing he could hurt me but chooses not to (or chooses to in fun ways). I'm drawn to a dominant/submissive dynamic (though I admit I'm inexperienced and don't really know what I'm doing…I know that kind of porn turns me on, anyway).
About the metrosexualization of males, I think it largely parallels the flapper stereotype of the 1920′s. For instance, wearing waistless dresses, bobbed hair, smoking and drinking were all imitations of something masculine. Yet the shorter dresses and “loose lifestyle” were sexual. Women’s rights have come a looooong way since then, and, not to say that feminism has done it’s hard day’s job and there’s nothing more to fight for, but women have gone such a greater distance then men have in that respect. Women are allowed to fill feminine gender roles, but they are also allowed (to an extent) to fill masculine ones. Men, on the other hand, are still stuck in their traditional roles. How many househusbands do you know? Metrosexual is the fashion trend that goes along with the more serious social and political movement. It’s sign of things to come 100 years from now.
On the subject of male beauty, as children we are sheltered from most things sexual, and then to see/experience sexuality all of a sudden is foreign/strange/gross. The thing is, women’s beauty is broadcast all over everywhere and is celebrated constantly, there nothing new or strange about a half dressed woman. Men’s bodies are not treated as such.
Btw, great article as always!
I find penises in porn kind of scary and intimidating because they’re so BIG!! It doesn’t make sense at all- if most porn is directed towards men most of the time (with the exception of the awesome sites you’ve posted
), why must the penises be so scary and huge?? Also, penises just tend to look sooooo weird on-screen… maybe because, unlike parts a woman’s body which are frequently shown in movies, you’d only ever see an erect male penis on-screen in a porno.
When I was questioning my sexuality before I actually came out as being bisexual, I began to notice that I was always attracted to the boys that seemed to take better care of themselves than me- the ones with the soft skin that never had pimples, the ones whose elbows were never scaly. I think the reason that girls are, in general, the “beautiful” ones in society is because society puts so much pressure on us to be well groomed, while guys can get away with a more grungy look as well.
But what I really find beautiful in girls (femme girls, at least), is not their well-groomedness, but their honest vulnerability- the whole macho man thing that guys always put on isn’t there.
So, I am a bit tipsy right now, so the better part of me thinks I shouldn’t post. But… whatever.
@Eliza:
Speaking humbly, I think that is actually the wrong question. I think as a culture we’ve gotten this weird idea that “objectification” is an inherently bad thing. But, as I have alluded to earlier, I think a lot of us actually want to be objectified to a degree.
I think the real question is: how can we objectify while still being respectful and still treating people as full autonomous human beings? And phrased that way, perhaps(?) it is not quite as difficult a problem. Dunno.
But I, for one, would love for women to ogle at me. But I also do not want them to lose respect for me as a person while doing so (which becomes creepy). It took me a long time to realize I could do both with respect to women, and that finding a women visually pleasing does not mean I am disrespecting her as a person.
I think a lot of it also just comes down to context. If I am interacting with someone in a professional context, then treating them sexually is clearly disrespectful. But I think what we often do not talk about is the reverse: that treating someone “professionally” or similar in a sexual context is also disrespectful. No? In the end, it comes down to treating someone as a full person, and calibrating for context and relationship.
I never thought much of the male body until the last year or so. Now I love looking at naked men, not even well-built men, just normal men. I love their strong legs and long feet and hairy butts and shoulders, it’s all so beautiful!
Flick, yes I am with you. & Everyone: It’s curious WHY women say that women are the more attractive gender, *especially* if they are straight. Is it just again that women are aligning their beliefs with men? Or because as Eliza points out, we can’t objectify men culturally. Or IS IT that women are more fluid, sexually. Recent studies have shown that women are in fact more bisexual than men. Some say there is a evolutionary reason behind it–that women traditionally take care of babies, so it would help them to be bisexual if all the menz, like, died on a hunting trip. I am actually thinking about writing about this “all girls as bisexual” phenomenon for next week.
So I am super curious on your thoughts– All of you guys!
Eliza, yes! When I wrote: hairy, sweaty, etc. I was going with the stereotypical things that get the “ew” reasoning. But it’s true, women are hairy and sweaty! And further, not all male bodies have the wang! I so love this attitude that it’s about the person you are with, and their body, the many facets of their sexuality. It seems there is so much more to learn about yourself that way.
Fuzzilla, Wow that is a fascinating counter point!
Daniel, love love love this view. Before the only arguments I had heard were that in the whole metro thing, women were turning men into women, that this stems from a generation of men raised by women. But I think you are spot on.
Jill, lol you are so right about the big penis thing!! It’s almost like, how can we make this guy MORE intimidating? Which, if that is your thing like Fuzzilla was saying–cool! But again what we NEED in porn is a wider range, more like what you would encounter in actual life.
Xakudo, interesting. My initial question for you was: how do we ogle? And I think you are right, context is most definitely key! But say, I am in a context where ogling is appropriate, a party. What then? Should there be some sort of unspoken consent given by each person? Maybe the answer is just more simple than I am making it out to be. For instance, when I am at a party and I ogle a guy, if I don’t get interested looks back I go “well I am being fucking creepy” and move on, a little embarrassed. Yet this still doesn’t get to that idea of treating them like a whole person…
Natalia, just writing about this has given me more permission to enjoy the male body. I hope others can give themselves that permission too!
Xakudo, I love what you say about wanting to be objectified to some degree. I see myself as someone who, throughout my life, has not received a lot of sexual/flirtatious attention. I don’t know why this is, and sometimes I’m grateful and sometimes I wonder wtf is wrong with me. I think you point out a really, REALLY valuable idea: “treating someone “professionally” or similar in a sexual context is also disrespectful.”
& I totally agree that what you are attracted to can change over time, and you can become attracted to something you didn’t think you would be when it’s on someone you love! When I was a kid I loved (pictures of) long-haired guys. My husband has a crew cut, because his hair gets bushy if he tries to grow it out. I still like to look at long-haired dudes, but I think its super-sexy when my husband gets a really “high and tight” haircut!
I really enjoy your thoughtful contributions to this discussion.
Arrived here for the first time via Rachel Hills. Really interesting comments. I’ve been thinking about this exact question recently. I still get a little sad that I’m not drooling with lust over my bf’s penis, but yes, perhaps it is a cultural, almost-homophobic thing. Thanks for daring to talk about this stuff.
I’m with Drop Out Boogie, Xakudo you are on fire! If that brain of yours comes up with anything else on objectification please type away, I am finding this super helpful.
Musehunter, Hi and Welcome! I absolutely love Rachel, I get her blog posts in my inbox and look forward to her searing insights
But, very glad to have you here, I think that owning one’s lust is a process, we are so taught to repress desire that it takes time to re-learn it. ALSO, I should point out that if you don’t feel lustful there isn’t anything *wrong* with you –there are some women who just won’t be that lustful towards penises. And some women who will not be lustful towards, well, anything really, as the asexual community has taught us! Thanks for posting
The notion of men’s bodies being ugly is definitely related to the fact that women are the default sex object. At least, that’s my intellectual understanding of it; as a straight woman, I’ve never understood it on a visceral level. I find most male bodies hot, and all bodies amazing. The variety of the human form is beautiful and impressive to me.
This post!!
I have been thinking about this A LOT recently, I think we spoke about it a little some time last year one one of your posts? But it’s something that bothers me a lot. Everything you’ve mentioned, really. The way that men are societally allowed to be topless, allowed to show their bums as a joke or as a grossout, and the way that the main-slash-traditional way of sexualising a man’s body is to play up the muscular, i-will-take-you aspects of it..
Ugh, so much mixed up and so unfair! So hard to de-program but so worthwhile!
I promise this isn’t just a wanton plug: the intimidation effect around positively objectifying men is why I started my webcomic That’s Not Sexy. It’s a comic about penis jokes; I draw penises in a realistic/illustrational-prettified way instead of in a bulging confrontational or shrivelly way. I want to give people (like.. nearly everyone?) who are unsure of where they stand re: hot dudes’ bodies a place to get themselves used to looking at cocks in a non-pornographic, non-confrontational way. I hope that just being used to seeing nice penises without having to be all, WOAH, A PENIS??!!!??!! – because the point (hurrhurr) of the comic is that there’s a *joke*, rather than just a penis which one must consider sexually/shockingly.
Wonderfully put, Lori.
Claire, “The way that men are societally allowed to be topless, allowed to show their bums as a joke or as a grossout, and the way that the main-slash-traditional way of sexualising a man’s body is to play up the muscular, i-will-take-you aspects of it..”
SO MUCH THIS. It’s the counter-sexism of this whole thing–the way it hurts women. While men’s bodies can’t be sexy and objectified, women’s bodies can’t be NON SEXUAL or funny! My friend Naked Jen tries to combat this with her “guerilla nudity”. She’s not a nudist, but is known to walk into hotels, restaurants, beaches totally nude with a non sexual vibe. I’m not sure how else to fight this double standard, but that is one way! Any ideas from you guys?
Here is Claire’s awesome web comic, check out the nicely drawn peens here: http://thatsnotsexy.smackjeeves.com/ <3 <3 <3
This article is definitely interesting.
Coming from a totally straight guy, I feel that people should simply see someone as hot, meh, ew, or whatever regardless of their sex, body type, face, etc.
Everyone has different tastes. Reading everyone’s comments here made it that way! But that’s just me being idealistic and into equality of the sexes and whatnot.
Rabbit said, “it does seem like women are more choosy then men. I think is again because we aren’t encouraged to own our desires –though some may say it’s a hormonal thing, I am not sure. The truth is that me and a guy who looks better than me could stand at a bar all night, and I have a better chance of getting laid. Probably. When I look around nightclubs and what not, it seems this is just the way it works. Women seem to be more choosy, but we can’t remove that phenomenon from the truth that women are taught to disown their desire.”
1. Women are more selective thanks to evolution because women have fewer eggs than men have sperm, therefore they have to be selective in terms of physical aspects somewhat.
2. Women have a better chance of getting laid at a bar if a man/woman were to stand idly simply because it’s up to a man to be assertive and make the first move most of the time.
3. It could be disowning desire, but couldn’t it also be “social conditioning” to wait around until the guy goes up to you? Like it’s wrong for a women to make the first move on a guy she is interested in?
In case this is tl;dr, I still feel like social conditioning plays a major role as well. But I’ll get to that more after a reply to the above points.
Guerilla Nudity! That is such a neat project, I hope she documents it?!
One of my earliest memories is digging the garden with my mum and dad; I was maybe three or four, and I asked why mum couldn’t take her top off in the heat like dad and I had. My parents did their best to not be restricting, but loud and clear I got “ladies’ chests are rude, men’s are actively unremarkable”. Major bummer!
Matt, I think you aren’t far off. I’m not sure about the egg and sperm thing, but for sure women have historically often been in charge of child-rearing. So being choosier is going to help in ensuring that the babiez are best taken care of.
And you are right, men are taught to be assertive, women are taught to not make the first move! God, will someone start a campaign that reminds women they can make the first move? I really can’t believe how often I hear that noise from my own friends.
Ladies on this thread, thoughts about the whole “not making the first move” thaaang that women have been stuck with/still apparently adhere to?
Claire, she tooootallly does: http://nakedjen.blogs.com/ Love her! You guys should check her out.
LOL @ ” “ladies’ chests are rude, men’s are actively unremarkable”. Trying to figure out a way I can slide “actively unremarkable” into normal conversation.
I think @Ellie Di said it right, for me at least. I think vulvas and penises are both rather strange looking, but they’re also a lot of fun, so schmeh!
I also think that appreciating the male form in all its forms is almost something I had to train myself to do (thank you figure drawing classes and erotic photography). It took me a while but I’ve learned (and then experienced!) that every form has something to offer. Be they chubby, hairy teddy bears or smooth, effeminate lankmeisters, their bodies (beyond their wangs, here) need loving as much as ours do, and it can be a lot of fun to prove to them that they like it ^.^ teehee Just as much as girls might not know how to love on guys’ bodies, boys sometimes don’t know what they want to have loved on. They have such easy access to masturbation (kind of difficult to miss the dangly bits) that I think sometimes they skip over all the other fun sensual things that can be done to skin and hair and nipples to turn them on… and then can’t tell ME what THEY want.
Experimenting, of course, usually proves rather fruitful.
Also, Naked Jen and I should be friends.
I think that a lot of girls have trouble expressing lust for the male form, because as like you’ve said, we’ve been taught not too. However, I personally have trouble expressing lust for the male form, because I find soft lips, a curvaceous waist, long hair and smooth skin a whole lot sexier. But that’s just me! This isn’t to say I idolise the air brushed advertisements and billboards I see everyday. I’m much more partial to the real girls we see on Flickr, the ones who represent everyday life in all its imperfect, mundane and trivial glory.
@Rachel:
(Goodness, do we need female PUA material!)
So, I am going to use a bit of PUA terminology here. In PUA circles, a distinction is often made between “outer game” and “inner game”. Outer game is all about how you behave externally. You could be a total nervous wreck inside, but if you do not show it, you can still have great outer game. Inner game, on the other hand, is all about working on yourself as a person, and actually changing your thought patterns and how you react to things internally.
The thing that is interesting, is that both inner game and outer game affect each other. To an extent, you can start with whichever one you prefer, and as long as you are not completely ignoring the other one, it will eventually develop as a byproduct.
So, with that in mind, I would say we can talk about your question either in terms of inner game or outer game. Preferably some of both.
From the inner standpoint, when I say “treat them like a whole person”, I am more talking about having respect for their autonomy and basic value as a person, as well as developing the habit of noticing and engaging the parts of people that are available to you in a given situation.
To be a bit more intuitive about it, imagine one of those guys/gals who are really laid back, and who will engage a person at that person’s level/where that person is at. There is a kind of warmth to it. You get good vibes. But you can also imagine that when they see a hot body across the room, they also have that same sort of positive engagement with the person’s hotness, because at that point the person’s appearance and superficial behavior is all that is available for them to engage with, and there is nothing wrong with that!
Trying to imagine that kind of person’s ‘inner game’, so to speak, is really valuable, IMO. Not necessarily as the only way to do it, but as a jumping off point to find your own version of that within yourself. (Incidentally, this is an example of how PUA can be a self-help/self-improvement movement, depending on what aspects of the PUA community you subscribe to.)
From the “outer game” standpoint, I am actually really unsure how women ought to go about ogling. And there are a couple of reason’s for my uncertainty:
1. Guys are not a monolith (just like women!). And that means different guys will want different (often conflicting) things.
2. As human beings, we are often terrible at knowing what we actually want without first experiencing it. (For example, the guys that would “love to be hit on by women!”, but who go all deer-in-headlights when it actually happens, or who do not realize that–out of practical necessity–women they are not interested in will be included in the women that hit on them).
And especially because of that second bit, I cannot even say for sure how I would want to be ogled, because it has never (to my knowledge) happened to me before. In many respects, I would actually expect women to have a better idea of how men would want to be ogled, simply because they have at least experienced being on the receiving end.
But, with those disclaimers out of the way, I would say that having an “out” is important. So your suggestion here:
Is actually pretty spot-on. Sans the “fucking creepy” and “embarrassed” bits, as that is really not necessary.
In fact, as a woman, you probably do not need to worry very much about coming across as creepy, since few guys are culturally primed to see women as such (at least, not without a lot more prior evidence). Annoying, maybe. Creepy, probably not. Actually, guys are probably most likely to think you are judging them (at least, that is probably what I would think). So… just wear a reasonably friendly face.
But yeah… it is basically about trying to be mindful of the other person, and how they feel. And of course that is never going to be 100% reliable, especially from across the room! But I think it is the kind of thing that one gets better at with practice. You start to develop an intuition for the vibes coming off of people.
This also goes back to the whole “as long as you are acting ‘reasonably’” thing, from prior threads. So also be mindful that any one instance of a guy reacting badly, could totally be about him and not about anything you might have done wrong.
(Not sure if any of this advice is actually actionable. I would totally enjoy further discussion.)
In any case, I would absolutely encourage women who want to ogle, to just start doing it. And be open to making mistakes (probably a lot of mistakes), and learning from those mistakes. And, of course, do not get down on yourself too much for mistakes–even repeated ones. It is the natural process of learning.
Especially since, I think, a lot of this stuff is a procedural/tacit knowledge kind of thing.
(God, I am writing long comments… must… learn… succinctness!)
@Emily:
“Easy access” may be part of it. But I think a lot of it is that our culture tells guys that sex = penis, and, moreover, that exploring other parts of their bodies is un-masculine, or even “gay”. Men are also often shamed out of the “submissive” role or other atypical sexual roles for men, even if that would give them a lot of satisfaction.
But I am glad that there are women (such as yourself!) out there that recognize the phenomenon and are generous enough to help guys get over some of that. I often see people writing about how women are shamed away from exploring their sexuality–and that is very true–but I think to a large extent guys are as well. Guys may typically orgasm during sexual encounters, but orgasm is not everything, and I think our culture robs guys of most of the other bits.
As a personal anecdote: to this day, I still have a really hard time asking new partners to stimulate my nipples, even though nipple play is a big part of my sexuality. I have to feel really safe with someone before I open up about that kind of stuff, because I am afraid I will weird them out, which is a very scary prospect in such a vulnerable context. And I think I am a fair bit more open about exploring my sexuality and body than a lot of guys, so I can hardly imagine how trapped more masculine-subscribing guys are.
Rachel:
Aww… it’s no fun if everyone is agreeing with me!
(I am only half joking… I am intensely wary of group-think.)
@Xakudo:
“Speaking humbly, I think that is actually the wrong question. I think as a culture we’ve gotten this weird idea that “objectification” is an inherently bad thing. But, as I have alluded to earlier, I think a lot of us actually want to be objectified to a degree.
I think the real question is: how can we objectify while still being respectful and still treating people as full autonomous human beings? And phrased that way, perhaps(?) it is not quite as difficult a problem”
perhaps I was getting too philosophical. I wasn’t meaning that objectification was a bad thing. What I was trying to get at is how much objectification is a part of our aesthetic experience. Can we really see something as beautiful without in some way objectifying it, and what does that mean about beauty if it is only a form of objectification? Are both of those things then good or bad, or is it something that isn’t a moral decision?
Something interesting about beauty for is that when I am with someone for a long time, whether it’s romantic or just a friend, I can no longer tell if they are good-looking or not. If someone asks me how attractive they are, I really cannot honestly answer, because I am so far past their appearance. They just look like them. Perhaps it’s because I can no longer see them only as an object, but as an entire being. Am I the only one who is like this?
@Rachel: Naked Jen sounds like the coolest person in world. It’s like she’s attacking the male gaze in reality instead of just in art. That’s bloody brilliant.
And on your point about women making the first move, I think it depends on the definition of “move.” For example, while someone may be the first to hand out their number, they may not be the first to lean in for the kiss. Or it can get even more subtle, where someone holds eye contact first, or puts their hand in an easily grabable position. I think the best thing for both men and women to do is just go with what they want to do. If you want to approach someone, do it, and if you don’t, don’t. You have a 50/50 shot of them reciprocating, so just do what you are comfortable with. Don’t try to force anything, knock out your inner-critic, and just follow your instinct.
Most males bodies are not beautiful because most males don’t take care of themselves by eating right and exercising. So I can see how a lot of women are turned off or confused by the sight of nude dudes. I’m sitting in a office right now and every single guy here has a terrible body. It’s also been my experience that gals are more attracted by attitude and overall charisma than purely by the physical, although certainly physical gets you in the door. My two cents.
You bring up some really interesting issues here about gender stereotypes and sexual taboos. First your post got me thinking about how much I love male bodies. Then it reminded me of how new sex-positive feminists in my native Norway have complained recently about how though it’s now expected for modern women to be sexually competent, expressing desire–being horny–is still something they should not do. That’s somehow gross. — If it’s also gross for men to be vocal about sex, the culprit seems to be desire as such; meaning both women and men should accept your challenge to own their lust.
Really important conversation, this.
For those of us who grew up feeling “thrown to the dogs” about sexuality, as in not feeling prepared and preyed on too early, we now find ourselves in committed relationships with men we may love, yet don’t necessarily feel like being sexual with often. The cycle of hurt feelings, guilt and retaliation is unhealthy, so we need to have discussions like this because otherwise we get nowhere.
First, as women we bear the scars not just of our own trauma histories, but those of our gender stretching back into time immemorial. Don’t mean to fall back on the denouncement of “patriarchy,” knowing it’s now an annoying buzz-idea, but resulted in hurt and humiliated of women and girls for countless generations. However, it also did that to men and boys, both the ones who were hard enough to “earn their stripes” in the male system and those who, because they couldn’t or wouldn’t, didn’t.
A system that hurts both it’s adherents and its disenfranchised clearly needs to go, but we can’t figure out what to replace it with because we are still clearly affected by the biological evolutionary realities that put it in place to begin with. The idea that bodies are gross, whether male or female, is a natural aversion to a thing that may bring up uncomfortable memories, personal and/or ancestral: nakedness, sexuality, predators. Disgust and ridicule can be a tool for self-protection, and a weapon for those who feel powerless.
As a woman, I feel insulted if shown little interest by men, and disgusted if shown too much. For those of us who bear the scars of our histories, sex has to be on our terms or not at all, terms that may change at any point. Our challenge, and it is a great challenge, is to find and keep partners who can or will accept this. If we ultimately know our own worth, our partner will too, and be able to make educated choices about what they can accept or put up with.
Calling anyone’s body gross is cruel, and humans are cruel. Human society has and always has been forged by cruelty. The larger cruelties result in these “smaller” ones. We shouldn’t denounce the symptoms without examining the causes.
I don’t know if maybe I misunderstood you, but isn’t
Meanwhile, I just keep the light low and close my eyes at the right times.
“The thing is, male bodies are more visible than ever (…), but (…) this is harmful. (…) Men who consume television, music videos and magazines felt worse about their bodies. Interestingly, these guys had unhealthier sex lives too.”
exactly what we, meaning women, have been complaining about for a century? I mean, it’s interesting to note that men are suffering more and more from the weird body images media and culture force on us, but I don’t see the connection to “the male body is ugly”.
In fact, isn’t that proof that there is a development in the opposite direction? This whole “men are ugly” thing seems to me to be mostly that women, unlike men, have to improve their bodies and always strive to look better because they have to look good – in the eyes of men! – while men don’t have to invest time and money in their bodies because they are not the ones that should be desired – that would be ew, gay.
So what I think is happening is that women aren’t perceived as the ones that should be (sexually and aesthetically) pleasing alone anymore, and men are brought in that role too. That is, in my opinion, a good development – although of course the whole “you have to look exactly like this (photoshopped, well-paid, starved) person, if you don’t, you’re not worthy” isn’t good, whether it applies to men or to women.
That said, I actually think there are a LOT of hot male men, but I find it quite hard to call a man/boy really beautiful.
Oh, I’m one of those who feels like wangs are ugly. Seeing one is a turn-off for me, even if it is attached to my favorite human being. I guess I have some issues, but don’t we all
“Most males bodies are not beautiful because most males don’t take care of themselves by eating right and exercising. ”
That’s a pretty narrow, media-centered taste you have there, Lance. I (gay male) happen not to find the gym rat WeHo ideal to be all that attractive at all. And don’t get me started on shaving and manscaping. It makes guys look like boiled rats.
I think there are a couple of things going on. One is that this celebration of the female body instead of the male body is recent – in classical times the male body was definitely considered more interesting from aan esthetic sense than the female. The female form was more a matter of sexual interst, and that could easily be stigamtized as a weakness. And yes, that’s a male-centered view, because that’s who was making all the statues after all.
Christianity was pretty explicitly anti-body from the beginning (and I think this counter-intuitively has more to do with its Hellenic side than the Judaic side.) When that started to turn around in the Renaissance, and then later in the Romantic period, the interest passed to the female form.
Also there’s the Fear of the Evil Penis going on. That panders to macho strutting about men being all dangerous, and rape fears just build on that.
For me the question of beauty is a little misplaced. Humans are not the most beautiful species, not by a long shot. Redwoods and gazelles and cats are beautiful. Humans – hair in all the wrong places, weird bipedalism, need for clothing in most climates – are not really very beautiful. Sexually attractive at best.
Hot damn there is still so much good conversation here that I fell off on. Jim, super intrigued by your comments about Christianity. Now, not to be *that girl* but today’s guest post about modern masculinity and metrosexuality really starts where these convos left off….super curious what you guys think http://rachelrabbitwhite.com/metro-or-bi-digging-deeper-into-modern-masculinity/
Also, accounts of straight college guys kissing. Now, who doesn’t like that??
I totally agree with you in saying – ew, the man’s body is sexy, or it’s gross, or.. whatever – but I cannot handle it. I always had the same problem in expressing any lust or even in “how to treat the whole thing, how to handle the guy”. And one day, I started a new thing. It just came up to my mind, dunno why, but I started to do the same things, like stroking etc., as I did with girls before. And hey – the guy liked it. So I dunno. I try to treat the guys like girls now. I mean. I am totally not interested in their bodies, but love the person behind. So it’s a bit hard for me to become lustful for myself. But at least I am not shy or feel displaced beneath the guy anymore. They like the same things girls like. That’s my experience. I mean – we are all humans, aren’t we?
(Sorry for bad English, no native speaker…)
Thinking foreskins are dirty and gross has led to me not having one. Fuck you society.
3 Trackbacks
[...] right? Rachel Rabbit White wonders why some women still find male bodies gross. And Jezebel asks why women’s bodies are [...]
[...] bodies in porn: gross or [...]
[...] “Women are pieces of art, men aren’t”? [...]